Efficiency and strategy-proofness in object assignment problems with multi-demand preferences
نویسندگان
چکیده
Consider the problem of allocating objects to agents and how much they should pay. Each agent has a preference relation over pairs of a set of objects and a payment. Preferences are not necessarily quasi-linear. Non-quasi-linear preferences describe environments where payments influence agents’ abilities to utilize objects. This paper is to investigate the possibility of designing efficient and strategy-proof rules in such environments. A preference relation is single demand if an agent wishes to receive at most one object; it is multi demand if whenever an agent receives one object, an additional object makes him better off. We show that if a domain contains all the single demand preferences and at least one multi demand preference relation, and there are more agents than objects, then no rule satisfies efficiency, strategy-proofness, individual rationality, and no subsidy for losers on the domain.
منابع مشابه
Impossibilities for probabilistic assignment
We consider the problem of assigning objects probabilistically among a group of agents who may have multi-unit demands. Each agent has linear preferences over the (set of) objects. The most commonly used extension of preferences to compare probabilistic assignments is by means of stochastic dominance, which leads to corresponding notions of envy-freeness, efficiency, and strategy-proofness. We ...
متن کاملProbabilistic Assignment: A Two-fold Axiomatic Approach
We study the problem of allocating objects by means of probabilistic mechanisms. Each agent has strict preferences over objects and ex post receives exactly one object. A standard approach in the literature is to extend agents' preferences over objects to preferences over lotteries de ned on those objects, using the rst-order stochastic dominance criterion, or the sd-extension. In a departure f...
متن کاملCoalitional Strategy-Proofness in Economies with Single-Dipped Preferences and the Assignment of an Indivisible Object
We study two allocation models. In the first model, we consider the problem of allocating an infinitely divisible commodity among agents with single-dipped preferences. In the second model, a degenerate case of the first one, we study the allocation of an indivisible object to a group of agents. Our main result is the characterization of the class of Pareto optimal and coalitionally strategy-pr...
متن کاملA Note on Object Allocation under Lexicographic Preferences
We consider the problem of allocatingm objects to n agents. Each agent has unit demand, and has strict preferences over the objects. There are qj units of object j available and the problem is balanced in the sense that ∑ j qj = n. An allocation specifies the amount of each object j that is assigned to each agent i, when the objects are divisible; when the objects are indivisible and exactly on...
متن کاملDiscussion Paper No. 852 STRATEGY-PROOFNESS AND EFFICIENCY WITH NONQUASI-LINEAR PREFERENCES: A CHARACTERIZATION OF MINIMUM PRICE WALRASIAN RULE
We consider the problems of allocating several heterogeneous objects owned by governments to a group of agents and how much agents should pay. Each agent receives at most one object and has nonquasi-linear preferences. Nonquasi-linear preferences describe environments in which large-scale payments influence agents’ abilities to utilize objects or derive benefits from them. The “minimum price Wa...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Social Choice and Welfare
دوره 47 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016